Dec 2, 2007 · Question: on the RP1000 can you use one row of buttons as presets (1-5) and the other (6-10) as on/off effects? I'd always go back and forth on my RP500. In other words, have …

Mar 24, 2008 · Started out looking into a Boss ME 80 then a GT 1000. Two friends that don't know each other convinced me to take a serious look at the Rp500 and while searching and …

Feb 22, 2011 · The RP1000 has a better reverb, and don't get me wrong, its amp models are really good, only the HD500's are better. The HD500 has dual signal chains and allows you to …

Aug 16, 2011 · IMO the amp modelling on the RP1000 is good, but like most digital technology, amp modelling is improving rapidly every generation and the RP doesn't really compare to the …

May 9, 2013 · The RP1000 would be the PERFECT unit for me if it had slightly more dynamic amp/cab modeling, user loadable IRs, a flexible signal chain (with dual signal paths), and …

Mar 9, 2009 · The RP1000 is the way to go; I have owned both and the RP1000 is much better as far as using it in a live situation because you can set the bottom row of 5 buttons to use them …

Dec 13, 2009 · I run my RP1000 into the power amp of a HRDx with the cab sim set to direct. I use the internal speaker (RW&B) when I want American tonality or plug into a sealed 1x12 …

So you would do it like this: guitar > RP1000 input; RP1000 effects send > amp input; amp effects send > RP1000 effects return; RP1000 output > amp effects return. I have my M13 hooked up …

Jan 25, 2017 · The RP1000 is considered old but I think it's fantastic, and the footswitch functions and layout could not possibly be better. I second this opinion. I have both and for live the …

Apr 7, 2010 · As far as the 1000 vs 500 and X3 vs XT, I would say without hesitation that the X3 is better than the XT just because of the slightly better algorithms and the dual tone capabilities. …